With an encrypted read speed of 112MB/s, drive performance is balanced with its single Gigabit Ethernet port. Most users would find a storage amount more than acceptable. While it may only have a single drive bay, the DS120j can accept a drive up to 16TB in size. It's modest in every sense of the word, but for the price, it's got a surprising number of tricks on offer. If you're only looking for an inexpensive and simple way to add local file storage to your network, then the Synology DS120j has you covered. However, not everyone who wants a NAS is looking for speed or additional reliability. When does "budget" become cheap? Some might argue that a NAS with only one drive bay defeats the point of having such a device. For example, if you need a NAS to transcode 4K video or edit video files directly over the network, it needs the hardware horsepower to make that possible. The NAS has a CPU, RAM, specific Ethernet port speeds, and maximum drive specs that you'll need to be aware of. When choosing a product, performance specifications on NAS devices are as important as those of a personal computer. Going beyond two drive bays comes down to your desired mix of maximum capacity, speed, and redundancy. However, with just one bay, all data is lost should the drive fail.Ī two-bay model allows for disk mirroring and is a better choice ensuring your data stays intact. A single-bay NAS (or even a simple external hard drive) is fine for users who only want to stream media, create basic backups, or have fast local shared storage. The number of drive bays is the first decision you need to make. The key aspects you need to consider before buying one can be broken down into a few broad categories. A NAS hard drive is essentially a specialized computer and, like all computers, comes in many varieties. At the moment I am using both for backup, but I want to stick with just one to save space.īut which advantages or disadvantages do I overlook here? Maybe compression is better with one of them? Transfer speeds? Possibilities to restore the whole system with TimeMachine? Files/Folders that are backup'd (implicitely) with TimeMachine that I might forget to forget with Drive? TimeMachine eventually implicitely knows which files/folders do not need to be backup'd like caches, thumbnails, etc.While every NAS fulfills the basic function of attaching storage to your network, that's where the similarities end. So to me Drive seems actually the better approach. Another advantage: With Drive my backups from my Windows machine, Linux and Mac work all the same, the target folders on the NAS are in the same place next to each other, I know where to find stuff and it is all within the NAS user folder in contrast to the TimeMachine backup for which you have to jump through some hoops and create a separate share making permissions more difficult to adjust for multiple users. Those backup'd files will be accessible from other devices and OSes as well (If I need to access such file from Windows/Linux/Android). It has several advantages: The backup can be continuous so it backups each version of a file not only on an hourly or daily basis. On the other hand Synology Drive can be used to backup files and folder to the NAS. Opinions? Advantages of TimeMachine: It is perfectly integrated into MacOs. I should probably do a versioned backup but that seemed kind of overkill back then. HyperBackup is creating a daily copy of this TimeMachine backup, but if it is corrupt, then this copy might be useless as well. I had to create new ones and basically lost the history. Unfortunately it occured already twice that this backup somewhat got corrupted in a way that I could not continue to use it. In the beginning I used TimeMachine to backup my Macbook to a Synology NAS. I need to hear some opinions and maybe some advantages and disadvantages that I did not think of yet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |